Identification: MON02
Identification: MON03
• Reviewing current positive and negative examination trends to ensure proper staff training and exam preparation
• Analyzing recent and upcoming regulatory changes impacting compliance functions
• Scrutinizing recent regulatory guidance and actions to identify practical lessons to improve AML management
Identification: MON04
Identification: MON05
• Developing and assigning numeric values to AML risks to attain quantifiable client assessment outcomes
• Testing data-driven assessment models to ensure systemic integrity and accurate risk analysis
• Tailoring quantitative AML risk models for unique business lines to optimize relevance and usage throughout enterprise
Identification: MON06
• Outlining unique cybersecurity vulnerabilities that enable crime to protect against similar events
• Analyzing institutional reaction to cyber events to discern best practices for stopping intrusions and securing unaffected data
• Detailing discrete challenges to investigating cyber crime to develop pro-active response plans
Identification: MON07
Presented by Swift
• Understanding the evolving threats to your own institution and your business counterparts
• Taking appropriate steps to protect your organisation with the right policies, processes and people
• Exploring how fraud, cyber-crime and AML teams can join forces to address the threat
Identification: MON08
Presented by Fiserv
• Looking at ways to utilize KYC data to improve your AML operations
• Identifying more suspicious activity
• Driving revenue to your firm
Identification: MON09
• Reviewing unique AML and fraud risks of microcaps to ensure adequate CIP and conduct robust monitoring
• Investigating suspicious activities to identify relevant facts and file SAR as warranted
• Conducting staff training and independent testing to assure AML models withstand regulatory rigors
Identification: MON10
• Verifying patron identity with required documents and creating risk profiles based on factors such as country of residence, negative news reports and possible PEP ties
• Conducting due diligence on high-volume patrons to assess source of funds and spot red flags such as ties to shell firms and unusually large increases in gaming activity
• Mitigating risks by formalizing protocols for patron payout systems, investigating potential structuring, filing SARs and terminating patron relationships as warranted